马克思主义和中华传统文化关系的三种主要阐释范式  

Three Major Interpretation Paradigms of the Relation Between Marxism and Traditional Chinese Culture

作　　者：李元旭[1,2] 平章起[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学马克思主义学院,天津300350 [2]阜阳师范学院信息工程学院,安徽阜阳236041

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2016年第4期13-18,共6页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：安徽省质量工程思想政治理论课教学团队建设项目(2014jxtd121);<马克思主义基本原理概论>教学团队建设项目(2015JXTD03);弘扬核心价值观名师工作室建设项目(szzgjh1-1-2016-15)

摘　　要：对马克思主义和中华传统文化的关系主要存在着三种阐释范式。意识形态范式把马克思主义看作无产阶级的理论学说,把中华传统文化视为地主阶级的思想体系。这种范式从文化与经济、政治的关系入手认知文化,看到了文化和意识形态的内在联系,但忽视了意识形态的独立性和文化的继承性,忽略了意识形态和文化的区别。文明范式把马克思主义和中华传统文化分别归于西方文明和中华文明这两种不同性质的文明。这种范式突出了中华传统文化的不可替代性,但又往往过于强调中华传统文化的本位性而拒斥马克思主义。体用范式沿用了中国哲学史上的"体"、"用"概念,提出了"中体西用"、"西体中用"或"马魂中体西用"等不同主张。这种范式最具中国特色,但由于对"体"、"用"的不同理解和阐发,难以形成共识,容易导致文化独断主义。在马克思主义和中华传统文化的关系上,一方面要坚持对中国马克思主义的文化自信和自觉,另一方面还要探寻更具阐释力和适应性的阐释范式。There are three major interpretation paradigms about the relation between Marxism and traditional Chinese culture. The ideology paradigm takes Marxism as aproletarian theory, and regards traditional Chinese culture as the ideology of the landlord class. The civilization paradigm categorizes Marxism and traditional Chinese culture respectively into Western civilization and Chinese civilization. The noumenon and expression paradigm, following the concepts of noumenon and expression in the history of Chinese philosophy, comes up various proposals such as ＂Chinese ideas with Western expression＂, ＂Western ideas with Chinese expression＂, or ＂Marxism as spirit, Chinese leaning as subject, Western learning as usage＂. In terms of the relation between Marxism and traditional Chinese culture, we need to explore for interpretation paradigms of greater explanatory power and adaptability.

关 键 词：马克思主义 中华传统文化 阐释范式 意识形态 文明 体用 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]