手写与键入影响读写效果的研究争论及启示  被引量:2

The Debate and Enlightenment on the Effects of Handwriting and Keyboarding on Literacy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈京军[1] 许磊[2] 

机构地区:[1]湖南科技大学教育学院,湖南湘潭411201 [2]华中师范大学心理学院,湖北武汉430079

出  处:《现代教育技术》2016年第7期18-24,共7页Modern Educational Technology

基  金:国家自然科学基金"虚拟学习社区中信息资源建设模式变革研究"(项目编号:71473079);湖南科技大学博士启动基金"小学生键盘拼音输入与纸笔手写学习汉字效果的追踪比较实验研究"(项目编号:E51514)的阶段性研究成果

摘  要:传统手写过程存在动作轨迹和视觉的联合反馈,且直接产出字形;键入过程则分离了敲击动作和视觉空间,且字形是已定的,因此手写可能更有利于字词掌握及深层加工,从而对读写有更大的益处。文章指出,手写在对新字母的字形学习中有优势,但对单词的再认和拼写学习并不比键入更有优势;在诸如记笔记、作文等更高级的读写学习中,键入和手写各有长处。由于键盘上并不存在汉字,长期采用键入方式书写汉字,有可能会给我们的读写带来负面影响。The process of traditional handwriting included combined feedback of movement and vision, and directly produced glyph; on the contrary, keyboarding process separated the motion and visual space, and the glyph was already designated. Thus handwriting maybe more conducive to the master and deep process of words and which was more beneficial to literacy compared to keyboarding. This paper indicated that handwriting had advantage on learning new letters over keyboarding, but did not have advantage on the recognition and spelling of words. In addition, in the more advanced learning, such as taking notes and composition, keyboarding and handwriting had their own strong points.Writing Chinese characters by keyboarding could bring about negative effect on our literacy, because Chinese characters did not exist on keyboard.

关 键 词:手写 键入 读写 记笔记 作文 

分 类 号:G40-057[文化科学—教育学原理]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象