检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方敏[1] 杨宝义[1] 汪蓉[1] 郭学珍[1] 曾雪[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属太和医院重症医学科,十堰442000
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第2期258-260,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:基金项目:湖北省教育科学“十二五”规划2011年度课题(20118511)
摘 要:目的 探讨虚拟教学法在重症监护技能教学中的应用效果.方法 选取我校262名护理专业学生为研究对象,随机分为两组,对照组131名学生采用传统的实验教学方法,实验组131名学生在此基础上采用虚拟教学方法.比较两组学生的课程考核成绩、一般自我效能和评判性思维能力.结果 实验组学生的课程考核成绩为(84.12±5.32)分,自我效能(2.72±0.35)分,整体评判性思维能力为(293.21±5.71)分,均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为-8.47,-11.66,-15.45;P〈0.01).结论 虚拟教学法能激发学生对实验课更大的兴趣,提高其考核成绩、自我效能和评判性思维能力,为学生以后进入临床工作奠定了一定的基础.Objective To explore the effects of virtual teaching methods on intensive care skills teaching. Methods A total of 262 nursing students were randomly divided into two groups: intervention group ( n=131 ) and control group ( n =131 ) . The patients of two groups were received traditional experimental teaching methods and intervention group also received the virtual teaching methods. The scores of course evaluation, general self-efficacy and critical thinking ability were evaluated. Results In the intervention group, the scores of course evaluation, self-efficacy and critical thinking ability were (84. 12 ± 5. 32),(2. 72 ± 0. 35) and (293. 21 ± 5. 71) which were better than those in the control group ( t= -8. 47,-11. 66,-15. 45;P〈0. 01). Conclusions The virtual teaching methods can stimulate learning interests of students and improve the scores of course evaluation, self-efficacy and critical thinking ability.
关 键 词:教育 护理 重症监护 自我效能 评判性思维 虚拟教学法
分 类 号:G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学] R47-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.94.158