检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《黑龙江高教研究》2016年第8期21-25,共5页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"普通教育和职业教育收益率实证比较研究"(编号:BDA100029)
摘 要:利用中国健康与营养调查(CHNS,2013)数据和拓展的明瑟方程,对中国各教育阶段收益率进行实证估计,结果显示,教育收益率总体上随教育层次的提高而提高,其中,普通高中低于中职教育,普通本科略高于高职,但基本接近。中国的职业教育收益率具有一定优势。受教育者应根据自身潜力,选择接受职业教育或普通教育;普通院校和职业院校应根据两类教育的收益率合理定位;政府和投资者要重视职业教育资源配置。This paper makes empirical research of the return rates in every education stage in China by using the data of China Health and Nutrition Survey( CHNS,2013) and the expended Mincer equation. The result shows that education return rates generally improve with the promotion of education levels,and that the return rates of general senior high schools are lower than that of middle vocational schools while the general universities are a little higher than higher vocational schools,but basically approximate. Therefore,the return rates of vocational education in China have some certain advantages. In addition,learners should choose vocational education or general education according to their potential abilities,general schools and vocational schools should be reasonably judged according to their return rates,and the government and investors should lay stress on the resource allocation of vocational education.
关 键 词:普通教育 职业教育 明瑟收益率 中国数据 实证比较
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222