检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘枫[1] 刘燊[1] 祝阳君[1] 徐强[1] 张林[1]
出 处:《心理研究》2016年第4期27-34,48,共9页Psychological Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目(12BSH055)
摘 要:选取87名大学生为被试(高攻击个体46名,低攻击个体41名),随机分配到三种不同情境中(挫折情境、挑衅情境与一般情境),考察不同情境下高攻击性个体的注意与情绪特点。结果发现:(1)高攻击个体对攻击词的颜色命名反应时显著长于中性词;(2)在攻击词的颜色命名反应时上,攻击特质与情境类型的交互作用显著;(3)在愤怒情绪变化量上,情境主效应显著,攻击特质与情境类型的交互作用显著。在挑衅情境中,高攻击个体更易产生愤怒情绪并对攻击性信息更加关注。In the current study, 87 undergraduates who had different trait-aggressive personalities(46 high trait aggressive individuals, 41 low trait aggressive individuals) were randomly put into three groups which were frustration situation, provocation situation and neutral situation. By controlling the situational variables, this study explored the attentional and emotional characteristics of high and low trait aggressive individuals in different situations. The results found that:(1) The reaction time of color word naming of offensive words was significant longer than neutrals for high trait aggressive individuals.(2) For the reaction time of offensive words, high trait aggressive individuals were significant longer than lows, the interaction between trait and situation was also significant.(3) For the change of the anger, the main effect of situation was significant. The interaction between trait and situation was significant too. The high aggressive ones might pay more attention to the offensive clues and were easier to be angry, and this effect was more likely to be caused in the provocation situation.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229