检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长安大学公路学院道路总体工程研究所,陕西西安710065
出 处:《铁道科学与工程学报》2016年第8期1642-1651,共10页Journal of Railway Science and Engineering
基 金:国家留学基金资助项目(留金发[2015]3022号)
摘 要:探讨主线和匝道连续分合流时相邻匝道的间距问题,根据每种分合流驾驶行为具体分析,分为主线连续分流及合流、匝道连续分流及合流4种情况,使用车辆变道模型、驾驶员标志识别规律、驾驶规律等方法进行研究。计算可得现行规范对主线侧连续分流匝道间距值规定较小,不推荐使用主线侧连续分流,而匝道连续分合流计算值比现行规范小,可在用地条件或其他条件限制下采用本文计算值。With the increase of traffic need and road network, the distances between interchanges are shorter and shorter, which makes a large effect on traffic efficiency, safety and stability. The values of standards cannot meet the need of real flexible exits combination. This paper concentrates on the issue of the net distance between two adjacent exits on main lines and ramp. Based on specific analysis of different driving behavior, including main line adjacent merge and diverge, ramp adjacent merge and diverge. A series of recommend values for different situations was worked out by modeling with driving behavior, changing lanes and traffic sign recognition rule. The results show : the value of net distance between two adjacent exits on main lanes is larger than standard which in-dicates this design is not recommended in real. While the calculation value of ramps is shorter than the standard that can be used in real with demonstration.
分 类 号:U412.352.12[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.175.173