德育活动中如何对待“大义灭亲”与“亲亲相隐”  

The Correlation between the Principles of Righteousness above Family and Covering up for Relatives in Education

作　　者：张正江[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学教育学部

出　　处：《教师教育学报》2016年第4期45-52,共8页Journal of Teacher Education

基　　金：2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划课题“道德价值教育与道德事实教育研究”(13YJA880109);项目负责人:张正江

摘　　要：在社会日益复杂的今天，我们应当如何对待“大义灭亲”与“亲亲相隐”？从20世纪80年代后期至今，我国学界对孔子的“亲亲相隐”论进行了比较激烈的争论，多数人肯定“亲亲相隐”论，并给予其重新解读。其反面“大义灭亲”则应当冷静对待。从伦理学理论上看，“大义灭亲”与“亲亲相隐”的矛盾就是“孝”与“公正”的矛盾，需要在一个对“孝”与“公正”的关系有明确界定的、科学而成熟的规范伦理学理论指导下，才能够获得正确的答案。但当今，无论国内还是国外，都还没有这样的伦理学。在现实社会生活中，我们可以基于存在主义哲学、康德的道德定然律令和柯尔伯格道德发展阶段理论处理“大义灭亲”与“亲亲相隐”的问题。Nowadays,with thesociety becoming more and more complex,how should we deal with covering up for relatives and placingrighteousness above family loyalty in education？ Since the late 1 980s, researchers have been debating about Confucian covering up for relatives.Most people agree and re-interpretit.Therefore we ought to be careful when dealing with placing righteousness above family loyalty.In the eyes of Ethics,the contradiction is that of Filial and Justice,and solving it need a mature Normative Ethics which formulated clearly the relationship between Filial and Justice.But there isn’t a Normative Ethics today.In actual practice in education we have three options to deal with this problem：Existentialist philosophy,Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Kohlberg’s Cognitive-Developmental Stages to Moral.

关 键 词：亲亲相隐 大义灭亲 孝 公正 道德对话 

分 类 号：B82-057[哲学宗教—伦理学]