检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]绥化学院食品与制药工程学院,黑龙江绥化152061
出 处:《黑龙江畜牧兽医》2016年第9期136-139,共4页Heilongjiang Animal Science And veterinary Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(21201128);绥化市科技计划项目(KJZD20110076)
摘 要:为了研究不同提取方式对玉米皮多糖体外抗氧化活性的影响,试验分别采用酶法、超声波法、微波法、微波辅助超声波法以及传统热水浸提法提取玉米皮多糖,并对不同提取方式得到的多糖进行了体外抗氧化活性研究。结果表明:超声波结合微波法提取得到的多糖含量最高,为15.85 mg/g,但其抗氧化能力最低;传统热水浸提法得到的多糖含量最低,为8.50 mg/g,其抗氧化能力也较低;酶法提取得到的多糖含量较高,为12.99 mg/g,且其抗氧化能力最高。To study the effects of different extraction methods on the antioxidant activityin vitro of polysaccharides from corn bran, five different methods were used to extract polysaccharides from corn bran, including enzymatic method, ultrasonic method, microwave method, microwave - assisted ultrasonic method, and traditional hot water leaching. The polysaccharides extracted from corn bran using different extraction methods were used for the study of antioxidant activity in vitro. The result showed that the content of polysaccharides extracted Using microwave - assisted uhrasonic method was highest, which was 15.85 mg/g, however, the antioxidant activity was lowest; the content of palysaccharides extracted u- sing traditional hot water leaching was lowest, which was 8.5 mg/g, while the antioxidant activity was very low; the content of polysaccharides extracted using enzymatic method was very high, which was 12.99 mg/g, while the antioxidant activity was highest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.105.128