从编撰者思想的呈现看《剑桥中国文学史》的“后现代性”——以孙康宜所撰部分为例  

Post-modernity of Cambridge history of Chinese Literature through the Presentation of the Editors' Thoughts——Taking Kang-I Sun's Part as an Example

作　　者：李梦圆[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中文系

出　　处：《理论界》2016年第8期108-113,共6页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：《剑桥中国文学史》以1375年为界分为上、下两卷,分别由宇文所安、孙康宜主编。此书各章分别由具有不同学术与表达风格的美国汉学界著名学者写就,故与之前的中国文学史相较,此书最鲜明地体现了编撰者个人的风格和思想。这体现了文学史撰写的"后现代性"趋向,它最大化地成为编撰者思想的秀场,将编撰者从文学史的被动性写作中解放出来。从孙康宜个人的观点和思想在其所撰《剑桥中国文学史》下卷第一章"明代前中期文学(1375-1572)"中的突出呈现亦可以管窥豹,发见《剑桥中国文学史》对传统文学史的男性主体性、理性至上及普遍性的批判和超越,人的自由审美生活得到尊重与实现。Cambridge history of Chinese Literature is divided into two volumes for the sector in1375, editored respectively by Stephen Owen and Kang-I Sun.Each chapter of this book was written by famous sinologist in the United States with different academic opinions and expression styles.Therefore, compared to the history of Chinese literature before, this book has most clearly reflected the editor＇s personal style and thought,which reflects the tendency of post-modernity in literature history writing, it becomes a show of the editors＇ thoughts and liberates the editors from passive writing.From Kang-I Sun＇ s personal views and thoughts expressed in chapter one‘Literature of the early Ming to mid-Ming（1375-1572）＇volume II Cambridge history of Chinese Literature, we can find its criticism and transcendence of traditional literature history＇ male subjectivity, rationalism and universality, the human beings＇ freedom in aesthetic life is respected and realized.

关 键 词：孙康宜 剑桥中国文学史 后现代性 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]