普遍语用学的乌托邦困境与语用学的生活重构  

The Utopian Problem of Universal Pragmatics and the Life-Based Reconstruction of Pragmatics

作　　者：殷猛[1] 

机构地区：[1]黄山学院,安徽黄山254041

出　　处：《大理大学学报》2016年第9期43-49,共7页Journal of Dali University

基　　金：安徽省高校人文社会科学重点项目(SK2015A529);安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目(GXYQZD2016296);安徽省高校省级教学研究项目(2013jyxm217)

摘　　要：哈贝马斯的普遍语用学具有"形式性""规范性""前提性"三重意蕴,在捍卫理性、促进交流、增进希望等方面有一定意义。但是,由于哈贝马斯误解了马克思的劳动实践,抽离了马克思哲学的现实生活语境,将普遍语用学建基于话语交往的理性共识,从而遭遇乌托邦幻像的困境。克服普遍语用学的乌托邦困境就要重新回到马克思,在马克思生活哲学观的指导下对语用学进行"生活"重构。实现了重构的"生活语用学"对国际交往中多元价值观的促进、对现实生活中语言异化的批判、对研究与解决改革中面临的实际问题具有重要的现实意义。There are three implications in universal pragmatics(UP) put forth by Habermas: 'formality' 'normativity' and 'fundamentality', which are significant in safeguarding rationality, promoting communication, and strengthening the hope for the future. However, UP is criticized for its Utopia because Habermas sets its foundation on the rational agreement of linguistic communication as the result of the fact that he misunderstands Marx's labor practice and dissociates the real life context of Marx's philosophy. Therefore, in order to solve the Utopian problem of UP, we need to return to Marx and conduct the life- based reconstruction of pragmatics guided by Marx's philosophy of life. The pragmatics after reconstruction, that is, 'the pragmatics of life',has the practical significance of accelerating plural axiology in international contacts, criticizing language alienations in reality and solving the real problems encountered in the development of China's ongoing reform.

关 键 词：普遍语用学 乌托邦 马克思 生活语用学 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]