检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈洁[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院,上海200433
出 处:《城市发展研究》2016年第9期10-18,共9页Urban Development Studies
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41401140);浦江人才计划(13PJC016);复旦大学新进青年教师科研起步项目(JJH3548018);复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院科研基金
摘 要:居住区位在移民的社会融合过程中发挥着关键作用。在当代中国,大量移民迁居城市寻求机会,但大多数居住在相对落后的城市边缘地带。采用在上海展开的随机问卷调查,考察定居郊区对移民融入城市所产生的区位效应。研究发现,在控制个体特征影响的情况下,郊区移民不仅在收入上低于中心城区移民,而且建立群际间的社会关系的机会也显著降低。郊区居民几乎无望迁居资源更为丰富的中心城区,很可能长期困于郊区。应对新常态下城市治理模式的转型,亟需为郊区移民聚居社区提供高质量的公共设施和服务,给予移民在城市中更多的发展机会,促进移民在城市中的融合。There has been extensive research on the social implication of (im)migrants' residential location. In China, migrants usually concentrate in neighborhoods at the urban edge where both good job opportunities and quality public facilities are relatively limited. Based on a random survey conducted in Shanghai, this study empirically examines the place effects of migrants' suburban residential location on their incorporation into the cities. The results show that, it is more difficult for migrants living in the suburbs to achieve both economic and social integration than those living in the central city. Moreover, with little chance to realize spatial assimilation by moving to central locations, they are likely to be trapped in the suburbs. Therefore, migrant integration policies need to focus on the improvement of suburban migrants' access to opportunities and public services.
分 类 号:K901.2[历史地理—人文地理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3