检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾祖钊[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽大学文学院
出 处:《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第5期163-169,共7页Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:现在美学和文艺理论都到了必须走向创新重建的关键期,而反思问题和现象往往是走向建设的起点。"哲理美"便是这样一个关键点。哲理美是否可能,长期在西方争论不休。这个问题的解决,仅限于西方语境是难有结论的。中国古代先贤早就明确地认为哲理美是可能的。这不仅可以结束千古争论,而且对西方和中国具有同样重大的学术意义:既可以激活古今哲理美学观,引起理论反思,调整美学主流话语而归于合理,完成文艺理论在后现代语境中重建与超越;还可以引起对文学艺术发展自律的觉察,掀起重写美学史、文艺史的热潮,有一石激起千层浪的可能。Aesthetics and literary critical theory have now entered into a key phase of innovative reconstruction which starts with critical rethinking.Philosophical beauty is such a key term.There has been a lasting debate over the possibility of philosophical beauty in the West where it is hard to produce any definite conclusion given its critical context.Ancient Chinese sages believed that philosophical beauty is possible,which is of theoretical significance to West and China.On one hand,by animating various aesthetic views,it may rekindle theoretical rethinking and modulate mainstream aesthetic discourse to the normal,thus transforming literary critical theory in the postmodern context.On the other hand,it may shed a new light on the autonomous laws of literary and art creation,hence starting a new wave of rewriting aesthetic and literary history.In this way the attention to classical Chinese aesthetic resources would not be confined to Chinese scholars.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15