检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩雪亮[1]
机构地区:[1]河南财经政法大学工商管理学院,郑州450046
出 处:《心理科学》2016年第5期1248-1255,共8页Journal of Psychological Science
摘 要:作为组织实施变革的前奏,组织变革准备包括:(1)组织本身处于变革就绪待发状态,和(2)组织成员在情感及认知上能够接受和容忍组织即将实施变革的程度。文章通过对组织变革准备相关概念、内容结构和测量、前因和后果的梳理,整合出一个新的分析框架。研究指出:未来在深化现有研究的同时,宜多采用跨层次的视角探讨相关构念在不同层面上的影响机制,结合具体变革情境开发有针对性的测量工具,弥补现有研究不足、指导企业实践。。Organizational change readiness is the antecedent for implementing change. The scholars holding a psychological view argue that its main purpose is to sharpen the stakeholders' mindset. However, the scholars holding a structural view argue that it reflects the capacity of the organization in implementing the change and its ability to obtain the related resources. This paper reviews both views, especially the studies under the psychological perspective. However, the purpose of this paper is not limited to the review of literatures. Based on the present achievements in organizational change readiness research, this paper aims to explore a new theoretical framework about organizational change readiness. The paper reviews the development and measurements of the organizational change readiness, and analyzes the research trends under the panoramic view. It shows that: there are many scholars focusing on the individual-level. In contrast, there are few studies that are focused on the group-level and organizational- level of change readiness. Studies on the individual-level have confirmed the following findings: firstly, the individual tendency, group norms and organizational culture can predict individuals' readiness for change; secondly, the individual change-supportive behaviors, working attitude and employee's organizational commitment are all consequences of the organizational change readiness. There are few studies which have analyzed the consequences of collective readiness. Contemporary studies on the collective-level have concluded that the sustaining momentum of workshop, team climate, affective tone and emotional aperture can affect the collective readiness for change. Studies at the organization level can be divided into two streams. The scholars holding a psychological view emphasize the strength of the organization culture in readiness for change. One of these studies has confirmed that both the group culture and adhocracy culture have positive effect on individual readiness for change, while the
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28