检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁一鸣[1] 王雪梅[2] 陈江天[2] 刘玉兰[2]
机构地区:[1]北京大学国际医院 [2]北京大学人民医院
出 处:《医院管理论坛》2016年第9期49-51,共3页Hospital Management Forum
基 金:北京大学人民医院教育教学研究课题;编号:RD-Edu201309
摘 要:目的比较以讲授和案例为基础的教学方法在消化内科教学中的应用及其效果。方法对2015年进行临床实习的北京大学医学部八年制临床医学专业学生进行消化内科授课教学,比较以案例为基础的教学法和以讲授为基础的传统教学法在教学实践中的不同,采用病例考试成绩和调查问卷方法评价教学成果。结果传统教学组和CBL组学生的出科成绩显示,在问诊病史、诊疗计划方面两组学生成绩无显著性差异(P>0.05),CBL组鉴别诊断和体格检查方面明显优于传统教学组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CBL教学法优于传统教学法。Objective To compare the teaching effect of Case-based Learning and the traditional teaching mode in clinical teaching of digestive diseases. Methods Students of Clinical Medicine Eight-year Program from Peking University Health Science Center who took gastroenterology clinical practice in 2015 were involved in this study. Student in control group had class of traditional teaching mode and students in experimental group had class of Case-based Learning. Scores of case simulations exam and results of questionnaire were adopted to evaluate the teaching effect. Results There is no significant difference between students of experimental group and students of control group in history taking as well as diagnosis and treatment plan(P〈0.05). Students of experimental group were significantly better than students of control group in physical examination and differentiation diagnosis(P〈0.05). Conclusion Case-based Learning is better than traditional teaching mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.51.7