天津中等职业教育发展水平评价与分析  

Evaluation and Analysis of the Development Level of Secondary Vocational Education in Tianjin

作　　者：王良[1] Wang Liang

机构地区：[1]天津科技大学教育发展研究中心

出　　处：《职业技术教育》2016年第22期44-49,共6页Vocational and Technical Education

基　　金：天津市教育科学"十三五"规划青年专项课题"基于SWOT分析的天津职业教育发展战略研究"(VEYP5050);2014年度天津市教委社会科学重大项目"中等职业教育培养成本及其分担机制研究"(2 014ZD23);主持人:王良

摘　　要：采用5个一级指标和12个二级指标,构建了中等职业教育发展水平评价指标体系,从而计算出全国31个省市中等职业教育发展指数。按照发展指数,将全国31个省市分为四类地区,5个省市处于一类地区,6个省市处于二类地区,15个省市处于三类地区,5个省市处于四类地区。研究发现,从发展水平的区位分布来看,天津处于一类地区,在全国处于优势地位。主要表现在,师资队伍、资源条件和经费投入三个维度,发展水平处于全国领先地位;普职结构维度,发展指数不够理想;办学规模维度,处于劣势地位。从加强面向中西部地区的招生与合作、进一步优化职业教育资源配置、完善中职经费投入长效保障机制等方面,提出了天津中等职业教育未来发展的对策。By using five first-grade index and twelve second-grade index, the index system for evaluating secondary vocational education development level is constructed, and then the development index of provincial secondary vocational education is calculated. According to the development index, 31 provinces are divided into four areas, 5 provinces are in the first class area, 6 provinces are in the second class area, 15 provinces are in the third class area, and 5 provinces are in the fourth class area. The study found that, from the location distribution of development level, Tianjin is in the first class area, and in a dominant position in the whole country. In the three dimensions of teaching team, resource conditions and funding, the development level is in the country＇s leading position; in the dimension of education structure, the development index is not ideal; in the dimension of school sizes, Tianjin is at a disadvantaged status. From strengthening enrollment and cooperation for the Midwest, optimizing the allocation of resources, improving the long-term security mechanism of funds investment and other aspects, the paper puts forward some countermeasures for future development of secondary vocational education in Tianjin.

关 键 词：天津 中等职业教育 发展水平 评价 

分 类 号：G718.3[文化科学—职业技术教育学]