“六经皆史料”:“六经皆史”论的近代诠释及其意蕴  

“Six Confucian Classics Being History Data”:The Modern Interpretation and its Significance of “Six Confucian Classics Being History”

作　　者：朱发建[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2016年第5期123-128,共6页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"清末民初经学向史学转型研究"(14BZS004)

摘　　要：近代许多中国史家以"六经皆史料"来诠释中国传统的"六经皆史"论,彻底破除"六经载道"的传统观念,消解儒家"六经"中所含的意识形态权威;不仅将被神化的"六经"还原为古史书,而且进一步将其看作待证而后信的"史料",动摇其"信史"的地位。传统"六经皆史"论的近代诠释过程,既是对"六经"不断"祛魅"的过程,也是传统经学向现代史学转化在史学观念上的体现。Many modern historians interpreted the Chinese traditional theory＂six Confucian classics being History＂as＂ all the Six Classics are historical materials＂. This interpretation shake out＂ the six Confucian Classics containing Taoism＂, and dispelled the ideological authority of Confucian Classics. It not only reduced the＂ Six Classics＂ to historical books,but also regarded it as historical materials which remained to be confirmed,which shook its position of＂faithful history＂. The process of modern interpretation of the traditional theory that ＂six Confucian classics being history＂was the procedure of＂disenchantment＂of the＂Six Classics＂,and also the embodiment of history idea which affected the transformation from Confucian classics to modern historiography.

关 键 词：六经皆史 六经皆史料 近代 诠释 意蕴 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]