缺席与在场的错位——“三大戏剧体系”论争中的梅兰芳和阿尔托  

Malposition between Absence and Presence——The Controversy of Mei Lanfang and Artaud in“Three Drama Systems”

作　　者：康建兵[1] 张烨颖 

机构地区：[1]重庆工商大学艺术学院,重庆400067 [2]四川外国语大学大学外语教学部,重庆400031

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期107-112,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：争论多年的"三大戏剧体系"仍然包含着诸多意犹未尽的话题。考察新旧"三大戏剧体系"需从梅兰芳到阿尔托的演变过程中了解梅兰芳的延后影响及其阿尔托的在场失语,通过在"体系"内对布莱希特和阿尔托进行比较,既可以对"三大戏剧体系"的演变作出新解读,也有助于增进对阿尔托的理解和接受。There are still many enlightening topics on the Three Drama Systems after years discussion. Through the exploration of Mei Lanfang's delayed effect and Artaud's presence silence during the process from Mei to Artaud,and through the comparison between Brecht and Artaud in the System frame,we can get not only a new interpretation on the System,but also can promote to understand and accept Artaud.

关 键 词：“三大戏剧体系” 缺席 在场 梅兰芳 阿尔托 

分 类 号：J809.9[艺术—戏剧戏曲]