检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李胜利[1] 解德渤[1] LI Sheng-li XIE De-bo(Developing and Researching Center of Higher Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)
机构地区:[1]厦门大学高等教育发展研究中心,福建厦门361005
出 处:《高等教育研究》2016年第10期97-103,共7页Journal of Higher Education
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2014年度重大项目(14JJD88003)
摘 要:金砖国家高等教育质量是衡量其可持续发展的核心指标。印度高等教育比较优势明显,根本危机在于高端人才外流。中国在多项指标上表现优异,但高等教育管理质量成为短板。俄罗斯在高等教育普及化方面成效显著,但高等教育系统质量与高等教育管理质量面临挑战。南非总体质量排名处于末端,但在高等教育管理质量与科研机构人才培养质量上的经验值得借鉴。巴西面临全面的高等教育质量危机,可谓任重道远。金砖国家未来应在高等教育领域互通有无、取长补短、共同发展,全面提升全球竞争力。The quality of higher education has become the core indicator for BRICS to achieve sustainable development. As far as the specific countries are concerned, higher education of India has the comparative advantages, but the fundamental crisis lies in the brain drain of elite. A number of indicators of China are at the leading level in the world, but the quality of higher education man- agement has become an inevitable short board. Russia has achieved significant results in the popu- larization of higher education, but both the quality of the system Of higher education and higher edu- cation management is facing the unprecedented challenges. The quality of higher education of South Africa is, on the whole, unsatisfactory while both the quality of higher education management and the scientific research institutions have obvious advantages. Higher education of Brazil is faced up with a comprehensive quality crisis, and its development may be formidable. In the future, BRICS should communicate, learn from each other, develop and enhance the international influence of the BRIC countries in the field of higher education.
分 类 号:G649[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.74.181