检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李佳丽[1]
出 处:《教育发展研究》2016年第20期66-73,80,共9页Research in Educational Development
摘 要:本文基于正负向选择假说和理性选择理论,使用多水平分层法(SM)估计影子教育对参与影子教育机会不同的初中学生群体的异质性影响,尝试探讨影子教育对教育不均等的启示。研究结果发现:对于七年级和九年级学生来说,参与影子教育机会处于中间水平的中产阶级家庭的孩子从影子教育中获益更多,基于理性选择理论,影子教育是中产阶级有效维持教育竞争优势从而维护阶级稳定的途径。另外,负向选择假说在九年级学生中得到验证:较少机会参加影子教育的弱势学生群体能从影子教育中获益更多,增加九年级弱势学生群体影子教育机会可能是缩减教育不均等的有效措施。This study employsstratification-muhilevel(SM) method to estimate the heterogeneous effects of shadow education across junior high school students with different likelihood of using shadow education, and we try to find the enlightenment of shadow education to educational inequality based on positive / negative selection hypothesis and rational choice theory. The results indicate that: for students of both Grade 7 and Grade 9, the students of middle class families who have propensity in the middle range to use shadow education will benefit from shadow education, and it argues that participation in shadow education must be representing a rational strategy for the middle classes to secure educationaladvantage and maintain class stabilityhased on rational choice theory. For students of Grade 9, negative selection hypothesis has been tested that the students with disadvantage backgrounds who are less likely to participate in shadow education will also benefit more from shadow education, and this article concludes with some implications for reducing educational inequality among students of Grade 9 through shadow education.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3