检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学经贸管理学院,浙江杭州310023
出 处:《科研管理》2016年第12期55-64,共10页Science Research Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71072162):母子公司知识异质性;协同创新行为与创新绩效关系研究(2011-2013);浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地"技术创新与企业国际化研究中心"资助
摘 要:关于集中R&D还是分散R&D更能促进企业创新绩效,现有研究存在观点分歧。本文基于国内上市的高新技术企业,从知识基础观和组织经济学的不同视角,对R&D组织方式与企业创新绩效的关系进行理论分析和实证研究。在此基础上考察资源状况对上述关系是否产生影响,通过引入分别体现资源丰裕程度和资源多样性程度的变量:组织冗余和多元化,利用方差分析与回归分析方法探究其对于上述关系的调节作用。结果显示,分散R&D更能促进企业创新绩效,这种促进关系在不同行业中无显著差异,并受到未吸收组织冗余和产品多元化的正向调节作用。本研究结论对国内企业选择有效的R&D组织方式具有实际指导意义。There are no consistent arguments in existed literatures whether centralized or decentralized R&D organization structure promotes a firm' s technological innovation performance. With the knowledge - based view of firm and organizational economics, this paper examines the relationship between R&D organization structure and innovation performance and conducts an empirical study based on 362 hi - tech listed firms in China. Furthermore, we introduce two variables of organizational slack and diversification, both of which can reflect the status of resources composed of resource affluence and resource diversity, and explore their moderating effects on the relationship between R&D organization structure and innovation performance using variance analysis and regression analysis. The results show that decentralized R&D structure boosts a firm' s innovation performance irrespective of differences among industries. Furthermore, the relationship is positively moderated by unabsorbed organizational slack and product diversification. The results have important implications for Chinese firms to choose R&D organization structure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28