论作为“超羁押手段”的指定居所监视居住制度  

Residential Confinement at Designated Residence as“Harsher than Detention”

作　　者：郭烁[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京交通大学法学院

出　　处：《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第6期119-125,共7页Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science

基　　金：北京交通大学基本科研业务费人文社会科学专项基金资助(2016JBWH002)

摘　　要：当前距2012年刑事诉讼法正式实施已三年有余,基于多份实证调研材料数据发现,指定居所监视居住制度依旧没能走出"或者不予适用,或者侵犯人权"的怪圈。监视居住,尤其是指定居所的监视居住或许已成为比逮捕更严厉的,现行制度下很难找到制约、审查手段的羁押措施。这种尴尬司法实践的形成,是立法导致的、制度性的。另外,原先存在于部分学者心中的那种"改良"该制度的构想,被三年多来的现实证明只是立法的一厢情愿。指定居所监视居住,或许到了应被废止的时候。It has been three years since the official issue of the 2012 Criminal Procedural Law. Residential confinement at designated residence,however,obstinately remains in awkwardness, i. e. , it is either inapplicable or a violation of human rights. Residential confinement in practice imposes harsher conditions than arrest does. It has no balancing or supervising measures in the current system. Legislators and some researchers believed that residential confinement at designated residence might be a benign alternative to detention, and a way to improve human rights. Their imagination has been proved groundless by the reality of legal practice during the past three years. It is high time to end this legislative and institutional embarrassment.

关 键 词：指定居所 监视居住 人权保障 超羁押手段 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]