检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹晓东[1] 王凯[2] Zou Xiaodong Wang Kai(Research Center for Science, Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China Institute of Education Economics and Management, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学科教发展战略研究中心,浙江杭州310058 [2]宁波大学教育经济与管理研究所,浙江宁波315211
出 处:《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年第6期5-18,共14页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基 金:教育部科学技术研究项目(113007B);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71273232)
摘 要:在创新范式转型和经济发展新常态的背景下,中国还面临着科技创新中的"孤岛现象"和"知识悖论"等问题。随着中央政府权力的不断下放和经济改革的持续深入,从区域层面研究如何通过产学知识协同创新促进创新生态系统建设已成为可能与必需。然而,产学合作或大学科技成果转化的理论与实践通常都忽视了"知识双向动态流动"的协同创新模式。此外,有关知识网络的研究认识到嵌入性关系对组织间合作创新绩效有显著的正向影响,但忽视了嵌入性关系发展的决定因素——组织的知识网络能力和知识网络所处的制度环境。因此,为促进产学创新能力协同提升、实现创新驱动发展,急需研究大学知识网络能力、区域制度环境、知识网络嵌入性关系对知识协同创新绩效的影响机制。In the transition from efficiency-driven to innovation-driven economic growth, owing to inadequate capabilities of synergy in the production, acquisition, diffusion and application of knowledge, China is still facing challenges that need to be addressed urgently, such as the "islandingphenomenon," the "knowledge paradox," and other problems in science, technology and innovation. Meanwhile, the administrative decentralization and the economic reform in China have a localizing trend in knowledge flows in recent years. Therefore, in the new normal economy, it is not only nn^it, l,~ k.,+university-industry synergy innovation from a regional perspective to encourage the flow of material, energy and information in the regional innovation ecosystems. However, most of the extant research on university-industry collaboration or on the university technology transfer has focused on the "one-way flow of knowledge," such as licensing and contract research, overlooking the synergy innovation model of "two-way dynamic flow of knowledge," such as joint research and consulting. Other researches are fragmented for lack of coherent frameworks and conceptualizations which fully depict the dynamic and evolving nature of knowledge synergy innovation. While comprehensive research on knowledge network has confirmed with plenty of solid evidence that embedded ties have significant positive effects on inter-organizational collaboration innovation performance, they tend to focus on the "consequences" of knowledge network and neglect its "determinants," such as the knowledge networking capabilities of organizations and the institutional environments for network development. On the basis of China's actual conditions and the existing body of research, we adhere to the economic and social development concept of "Innovation, Coordination, Green, Opening up and Sharing" to raise the essential question of this study: Is it possible to fill the gap between the knowledge innovation level of university and regiona
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.106.159