论法家“法治”的内在理路——兼及法家的理论局限  

On Internal Logic of Legalists ' “Rule of Law” Ideology and Legalists' Theoretical Limitations

作　　者：王宏强[1] 

机构地区：[1]甘肃中医药大学政史系,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期11-16,共6页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）

基　　金：甘肃中医药大学"青年人才工程资助计划";甘肃中医药大学校级项目(TD2016YB14)

摘　　要：法家"法治"学说有一个自成体系的内在理路。西周以降礼崩乐坏的乱世,"以法治国"成为列国统治者新的治世追求。法家顺应了这一政治走向,主张统治者应当"因乎时变",用"法治"取代"礼治"。"法"应以"道理"为终极根据,以"信赏必罚"为实施手段。法家希冀"明君在上"以实现"富国强兵",最终臻于一个合乎"道理"的理想社会。可是君权至上论,使得法家法治的"政治理性"悉数被抵消而尽。Legalists＇ ＂Rule of Law＂ Ideology has a self-autonomous internal logic. The disintegration of social orders and rituals since the Western Zhou made ＂governance by law＂ the new principle of rulers of the kingdoms. Corresponding to such a political trend, Legalists asserted that rulers should ＂change with the times＂ and replace ＂governance of rituals＂ with ＂governance of law＂. ＂Law＂ should take ＂reason＂ as the eventual basis and ＂compliments and punishment＂ as the means of implementation. The Legalists wished to ＂prosper the country and build up its military force＂ through a wise monarch and eventually achieve a ＂reasonable＂ ideal society. However, the supreme monarch power counteracted Legalists＇ ＂political reason＂ completely.

关 键 词：法家 韩非子 法治 内在理路 

分 类 号：B226[哲学宗教—中国哲学]