如何面对“史料”：历史书写的不同文体与叙事特征--《资治通鉴》叙事中的史事考订与历史重述--基于唐太宗即位之初“诸将争功”事件书写的个案分析  

Sima Guang＇s Textual Criticism and Historical Representation in History As Mirror： A Case Study of the Event of Merit Scrambling among Some Generals under the Reign of Emperor Taizong of Tang Dynasty

作　　者：张耐冬[1] 刘后滨[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国学院 [2]中国人民大学历史学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2017年第1期1-10,共10页Journal of Renmin University of China

基　　金：中国人民大学教师教学发展改革项目“大学通识教育中的历史学及相关课程建设”(297615120521)

摘　　要：《资治通鉴》对李世民即位之初褒奖功臣时出现纷争的相关叙述，是不同于唐代实录、国史与《旧唐书》的另一种叙事，是以“资治”史观为出发点，在原有史料基础上进行的历史想象与情景建构。该案例体现了《资治通鉴》不同于此前各类编纂史料的叙事结构与叙事手法，基于这一案例，可以对《资治通鉴》叙事特点加以归纳，并提出《资治通鉴》叙事研究的基本方法。The story of merit scrambling among some important generals under the early reign of Em- peror Taizong of Tang dynasty was represented by Sima Guang in his History As Mirror （ZiZhi Tong Jian）. As a new way of historical narrative, History As Mirror built a different narrative logic from its source books, and represented some stories with historical imagination and situation constructing under its purpose of aid in governance. This paper summarizes some narrative characteristics of History As Mirror, and proposes some research methods for the study.

关 键 词：《资治通鉴》 “诸将争功” 叙事模式 历史想象 

分 类 号：I207.4[文学—中国文学]