“共同体”的分化:论《红楼梦》的“噪音”传播  

The “Community” Divided: “Noise” in the Dissemination of A Dream of Red Mansions

作　　者：冯文丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学人文与传播学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《浙江师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第1期66-73,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要："红学"是话语主体生产知识交流观点的场域。《红楼梦》在传播过程中一直伴随着喧闹的"噪音",如关于作者、家族、作品的虚假信息,编码解码中的信息错位,禁毁作品对信源的控制等。"噪音"的存在影响传播效果,不利于"意义"共享,使作品对社会的建构作用减弱,"红学共同体"从形成走向了分化。这其中,手抄传播是"噪音"滋生的源头,"旧红学"时代是"红学共同体"形成的阶段。"新红学"借大众报刊进行交流,不同的话语范式说明"红学共同体"开始分化。现在商业的介入、多媒体的应用,"噪音"被各种媒体放大,"红学"主体代表了不同的权力话语,"红学共同体"已经完全分化。＂ Redology＂ is the field where discourse subjects generate knowledge and communicate view-points. Since the beginning of its dissemination, A Dream o f Red Mansions has been accompanied by the clam-orous ＂noise＂ , such as the false information of the author, family and the work, information mismatch in encoding and decoding, and the source control of the prohibited and destroyed works. ＂ Noise＂ affects the dissemination effect, and is not conducive to sharing ＂meanings＂ , which weakens its social construction. ＂ Redology＂ community thus goes from formation to division. One of the sources that nurture the ＂ noise＂ is the hand-written dissemination, and ＂ redology in the old era＂ witnessed the formation of the ＂ redology community＂. ＂ Neo-Redology＂ communicates through mass newspapers; different discourse paradigms have shown that ＂Redology community＂ begins to divide. Now, business has been involved and multimedia have been applied, so ＂noise＂ has been amplified by various media. ＂ Redology＂ subjects represent various power discourses, and the ＂ community＂ has been completely divided.

关 键 词：《红楼梦》 传播 噪音 共同体 

分 类 号：I207.411[文学—中国文学]