证人调查:民事庭外作证的立法向度  

Testify outside the civil court for the Dimension of legislation

作　　者：李峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学法政学院,上海200234

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2017年第1期143-150,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目(15BFX068)"民事证人庭外作证体系研究";教育部人文社科规划基金一般项目(14YJA820013)"民事诉讼视听传输技术作证研究"

摘　　要：民事诉讼法规定的庭外作证,其程序功能已经异化为降低司法成本为主,弱化了证据调查作用,致使庭外证言的正当性、可信性严重不足,程序运作流于形式。相应的制度完善应当坚持证人调查为中心的转向,将庭外作证的条件、作证方式两部构造模式,充实为条件、作证方式、调查措施三部构造模式,以使庭外作证程序功能回归到事实查明的根本。通过委托调查等手段扩充证人调查的司法资源,针对不同庭外作证方式运用直接与间接的证人调查措施,为庭外作证情况下各项程序价值的平衡提供有效的制度保障。Given the procedure function has been changed to reduce the judicial cost as the main purpose and weaken the effect of the evidence investigation,legitimacy and credibility belong to the outside the court to testify that been specified by the civil procedure law,has facing an serious insufficient circumstances and being formalized. In order to modify the goal of the procedure function of the outside the court to testify,in other words focusing on the witness investigation,transferring the two structural parts pattern of testify that being formed as condition and mode into three structural parts pattern that consist of condition,mode and investigate methods that eventually be able to redefine the procedure of the testify outside the courts and bring it back to its original goal of ascertain the facts. Adopting measures such as commissioned survey is able to expand the judicial sources of the witness investigation. Aim at diverse ways of the outside the court to testify by applying direct and indirect witness investigation methods,constituting related investigate methods to offer an institutional guarantee for the balance of different procedure values of the outside of court to testify.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 庭外作证 程序构造 证人调查 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]