检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱叶秋[1]
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第1期127-132,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC740165)
摘 要:汉语名词的可数性问题研究主要包括形态句法的语法分析、汉语名词不可数论、可数性的量词表征论和汉语名词可数性的认知解读。汉英语隶属不同语系,以印欧语系的可数性区别为标准,判断汉语名词可数性有一定局限性。从量词与名词共现特点区分汉语名词可数性有一定的积极性,但其句法判断标准将复杂的语言体系简单化。认知语法观从概念主体对现实世界的主观识解出发,探究认知对语言表征的影响,是汉语名词可数性的研究的一个新视角,可以用于解释汉英语中可数性的共性和差异。Different arguments concerning the countability of Chinese nouns (CCN) have been proposed, including the one that all Chinese nouns are mass nouns and the one that the mass -count distinction in Chinese nouns is reflected in classifiers. Countability of Chinese nouns has also been approached from the morpho - syntactic perspective and the cognitive perspective. As Chinese and English belong to different language systems, the criteria for the count - mass distinction, which has been developed for Indo - European languages, may not be fit for the judgment of countability of Chinese nouns. The selective combination of classifiers and nouns can be used to judge the countability of Chinese nouns, but the syntactic features proposed to distinguish mass classifiers and count classifiers simplify the complex Chinese language system. Cognitive grammar, a new perspective to investigate the count -mass distinction, believes that conceptualizers play an active part in construing the world and aims to explore the cognitive influence over language proach can be used to explain the similarities of and the differences countability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13