同伴接纳下大学生宿舍人际冲突中的SIP特点  

Social-Information-Processing of College Students Who Have Different Peer Acceptance in Dormitory Interpersonal Conflict Situations

作　　者：刘仕凡 刘建榕[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学教育学院,福建福州350117

出　　处：《集美大学学报（教育科学版）》2017年第1期31-36,共6页Journal of Jimei University：Education Science Edition

基　　金：全国教育科学规划重点项目"社会性发展迟滞大学生的社会信息加工特点研究"(DBA130213)

摘　　要：学生社会性发展问题不断涌现,采用模糊情境问卷,分别测查、比较了不同同伴接纳水平(良好、一般和较差)和男、女大学生的社会信息加工特点。探究不同同伴接纳水平和不同性别大学生在宿舍冲突情境下的SIP特点,以及其各自是否具有独特的信息加工特征。结果:不同同伴接纳水平大学生的SIP在整体上差异显著(F=2.95,p<0.01);在目标澄清、反应形成和反应评估上,三组大学生之间存在显著性差异(F=4.05,p<0.05;F=5.12,p<0.01;F=5.60,p<0.01);大学生的SIP特点在性别上的差异不显著(F=0.78,p>0.05)。结论:宿舍冲突情境下,大学生SIP特点受同伴接纳水平影响。良好组与较差组各自具有独立的社会信息加工特点。; Objective We examined SIP of college students, which is to investigate how peer acceptance and gen-der influence SIP in dormitory interpersonal conflict situations. Methods ： A college students sample of 290 students （98 boys, 198 girls, average age = 20. 2） participated in this study. Assessments included peer nomination scale that was used to divide students into three groups （good, average and low） and self - reports of several elements of social - information - processing （ SIP） in dormitory interpersonal conflict situations. ANOVA and MANOVA were employed to explore the SIP differences among above three groups of students. Results ： Compared with the average students,low level students ’ global SIP pattern is significantly different （ F = 2. 95 , p 〈 0. 01 ） . Compared with the average students,good level students ’ global SIP pattern is not significantly different （ F = 0. 78 , p 〉 0. 05 ）. Conclusion In dormitory interpersonal conflict situations, there are significant correlations between peer acceptance and SIP.

关 键 词：同伴接纳 宿舍冲突情境 社会信息加工(SIP) 

分 类 号：G444[哲学宗教—心理学]