国外管理理论建构研究述评:三种逻辑推理的视角  

Review on the Studies of Management Theories Building abroad:View from the Three Types of Logic Reasoning

作　　者：白胜[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学管理学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《科技进步与对策》2017年第4期115-121,共7页Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划基金项目(13YJA630001)

摘　　要：受"没有什么比好的理论更有用"理念驱动,国外组织与管理研究者愈加注重探究建构管理理论这一议题。由此形成的丰硕成果观点各异,甚至彼此矛盾,而现有按照西方哲学术语对其分类不易理解。据此,以演绎推理、归纳推理和溯因推理为主线索,将国外管理理论建构研究成果归集为3个脉络,分析其在研究逻辑、理论建构策略和理论贡献评价标准上的差异,比较各自适用条件和彼此借鉴行为,并揭示溯因推理在管理研究中的良好应用前景。Driven by the idea of ＂ Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory＂,the foreign researchers in organization and management research are paying more and more attentions to the topic of building management theories,and obtaining the fruitful research results.These results are largely difference,even contradictory to each other.It＇s not easy for us to understand some classifications according to the terms of western philosophy.Based on the main clue of deduction reasoning,induction reasoning and abduction reasoning,this paper merged these research studies into three types.After analyzing their differences in research logics,research strategies and evaluation criterions for theory contributions,this paper appraises the respective application conditions and their adsorbing activities among them.Finally,the abduction reasoning is expected to be of broad application prospect in management research.

关 键 词：理论建构 逻辑推理 溯因推理 研究方法 

分 类 号：C93-0[经济管理—管理学]