后分句引导语“别说”与“何况、况且、而且”  

The Connector Bieshuoin the Latter Clause and Hekuang,Kuangqie,Erqie

作　　者：周莉[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,130012

出　　处：《语言教学与研究》2017年第2期76-85,共10页Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"语义演变视角下源于短语的汉语虚词研究"(13CYY068);吉林大学基本科研业务费"面向对外汉语教学的汉语‘语义-语法功能’接口研究"(2016QY008);吉林大学教改项目(2015XYB013)和吉林大学哲学社会科学青年学术领袖培育计划(2015FRLX04)的资助

摘　　要：本文从语义—功能视角对"别说、何况、况且、而且"的用法进行系统对比。从形式差异入手,文章揭示了它们语法差异背后的语义动因:不同层面的语用衍推关系。对于表达相同语义关系的虚词,本文一方面分析了它们形式差异背后的语法化动因;另一方面,比较了它们各自的功能差异。文章对这些虚词语义和功能的综合分析,解决了这些虚词间在什么条件下可替换以及替换后的语体差异问题。最后,从发话人角度总结出这些虚词的使用条件,以助于这些虚词的教学。This paper compares the four function words＇ usage systematically from a semantic-functional perspective. Based on their structural differences, the paper explains that the semantic motivation that leads to these syntactic differencesis pragmatic entailment of different semantic levels. As to those function words of the same semantic relation, we analyze their motivation of grammaticalization leading to their structural differences and compare their respective functional differences. Based on the analysis of semantics and function of these function words, we solve these problems that in what conditions these function words can be replaced each other and what＇s their difference after replacement. Finally, in the position of the speaker, we summarize the condition for expression of these function words so as to help their teaching.

关 键 词：语义—功能视角 语用衍推关系 语法化 语体差异 

分 类 号：H146.2[语言文字—汉语]