检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶青[1] 王小光[1,2] Ye Qing Wang Xiaoguang
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学诉讼法研究中心 [2]浙江省舟山市人民检察院反贪污贿赂局
出 处:《比较法研究》2017年第2期47-59,共13页Journal of Comparative Law
摘 要:死刑核准权收归最高人民法院统一行使以来,律师在该程序中发挥着越来越重要的作用,律师通过提交新的事实和证据、提交法律意见、向最高人民检察院申诉等方式,积极介入死刑复核程序,保障被告人合法权益。但是律师在死刑复核程序中也面临着参与不足、辩护权保障不到位、提交意见得不到有效回应等问题,要解决这些问题,需要进一步改造死刑复核程序的构造,完善刑事法律援助制度,充分保障律师的各项辩护权。The defense lawyers play more and more important role since the Supreme People’s Court have taken back the power of checking death penalty. The lawyers actively involved in the death penalty review procedure. They safeguard the legitimate rights of the defendant by submitting new facts and evidence,bringing forth legal advice,and appealing to the Supreme People’s Procuratorate,and so on. However,the defense lawyers face a lack of participation,an insufficient protection of the right to defense,a lack of effective response to their legal advice and other issues. In order to solve these problems,we need to further reform the procedure for review of death sentences,perfect the legal assistance system,and fully protect the rights of the lawyers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249