检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学土木工程学院,四川成都610031
出 处:《四川建筑科学研究》2017年第2期33-37,共5页Sichuan Building Science
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2013CB036302)
摘 要:桥梁健康监测系统以传感器测得的结构响应识别桥梁结构的模态参数,从而对损伤进行预警。然而,由于测试环境的限制,传感器老旧、损坏等情况时常发生,使得测试结果受到影响。结合探索性数据分析(Exploratory Data Analysis,EDA)方法,采用箱形图和QQ图对测试结果进行了跟踪,对分析结果异常的数据对应的传感器进行了修复,并对比了修复前后的模态参数识别结果。结果表明,经过本文所提方法处理后的测试结果能提供更为准确的模态参数识别结果,提高桥梁健康监测的准确度和效率。Bridge health monitoring system can help to identify the modal parameter from the structure response data collected from the sensors installed at these structures,thus a pre-warning about the damages in the structure can be issued on time. However, due to the complexity in the testing environment, there is always something wrong with the sensors, which eventually leads to false measurements. For this purpose, the demand for an accurate data evaluation method once the data is collected form these sensors has increased manifoldly. In this paper an efficient data interpretation method called Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is introduced. Based on this method, boxplots and QQ plots were adopted to track the inner trends in the measured data,and then based on these results,those sensors having abnormal data were overhauled. Finally, a comparison of the modal parameter identification result before and after the overhauling of sensors were presented. The result shows that an accurate modal parameter identification can be achieved after the adoption of EDA as a preprocessing technique. Thus in the end it can be said that, EDA has drastically improved the accuracy and efficiency of bridge health monitoring process.
关 键 词:桥梁健康监测 探索性数据分析 箱形图 QQ图 模态参数识别
分 类 号:U44[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145