大学生微表情识别能力与卡特尔16种人格因素的相关  

The Relationships between the Sixteen Personality Factors and Micro-expression Recognition of College Students

作　　者：范星[1] 申寻兵[2] 江洁[1] 连天星 马伟娜[1] 

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学教育学院,浙江杭州311121 [2]江西中医药大学人文学院,江西南昌330004

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（自然科学版）》2017年第2期130-135,共6页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学地区基金项目(31460251);江西省社会科学研究"十二五"规划项目(14JY28)

摘　　要：为探讨微表情识别能力、微表情训练工具(METT)的训练效果与卡特尔16种人格因素的关系,对41名大学生进行了卡特尔16种人格因素量表(16PF)和微表情识别能力的测定,结果显示:微表情的识别能力与乐群性、稳定性、恃强性、内向与外向型存在显著正相关;微表情识别能力在性别上无显著的差异,但在来源地上有显著的差异,来自城镇的大学生的微表情识别能力优于来自农村的大学生;微表情训练的效果只与敏感性存在显著负相关.由此可见卡特尔16种人格因素与大学生微表情识别能力存在一定的关系,并且影响微表情训练效果.In order to investigate the relationships between micro-expression recognition ability as well as the training effects of micro-expression training tools （METT） and The Sixteen Personality Factors, 41 college students were assessed by 16 PF and micro expression recognition ability determination. The results showed that the micro-expression recognition ability was significantly positively correlated with warmth, emotional stability, dominance, introversion and extroversion. The micro-expression recognition ability was no significant difference in gender, but there were significant differences in source places. The micro-expression recognition ability of college students from city was better than those from rural areas. The effects of micro-expression training were negatively correlated with sensitivity. Thus, there was a certain relationship between The Sixteen Personality Factors and the college students＇ micro expression recognition ability, which also affected the effects of micro expression training.

关 键 词：大学生 微表情识别能力 卡特尔16种人格因素(16PF) 微表情训练 

分 类 号：B842.6[哲学宗教—基础心理学]