语篇性概念的内涵  

Connotations of the Notion of Textuality

作　　者：于林龙[1] 于海洋[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学,长春130024

出　　处：《外语学刊》2017年第3期28-32,共5页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究基金项目"语境的经验性与本体性关系研究"(16YJA740045)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：语篇性作为语篇分析领域的核心概念,在学界已有过不少讨论,但其内涵意义尚未得到充分阐发。本文通过回顾和探究国内外有关语篇性概念的相关研究,得出以下结论:(1)要对语篇性概念的内涵进行充分阐析,须明确"经验性层面的语篇性"与"本体性层面的语篇性"的关系;(2)经验层面的语篇性相当于具体的语篇性标准,是复合概念,而本体层面的语篇性是抽象概念,故语篇性标准不等于语篇性本身;(3)语篇性标准(即经验层面的语篇性)能将隐而不显的语篇性昭示出来,反过来,本体层面的语篇性又能在语境中外化为具体的语篇性标准;(4)语篇性概念只有在其经验性与本体性的辩证关系中才能得到更好的理解。Texture （ or textuality）, a key notion in the field of discourse analysis, has been much discussed. Nevertheless, the connotative meanings of this concept have not been fully elucidated. Based on relevant researches concerning texture, this paper draws the following conclusions： （ 1 ） We must ascertain the relationship between ＂textuality on the experiential level＂ and ＂textuality on the ontological level＂; （2） The former, which is equivalent to the standards of textuality, is a composite notion while the latter is an abstract one; （3） The former can conjure up textuality per se that is hidden, and in turn, the latter can give birth to standards of textuality in context; （4） The notion of textuality can be appropriately interpreted and analyzed only when both its experiential aspect and ontological aspect are taken into consideration.

关 键 词：语篇性 内涵认知 经验性 本体性 语篇分析 

分 类 号：H314[语言文字—英语]