认知神经科学和汉语词类研究——后现代哲学思潮呼唤汉语词类研究方法的多元化和研究理念的整体化  

A Study on Chinese Parts of Speech from the Perspective of Cognitive Neuroscience——The Post-modernistic View Calls for the Diversification of Research Methods and the Integral Investigation of Research Objects

作　　者：孙崇飞[1] 张辉[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东财经大学,济南250014 [2]南京师范大学,南京210097

出　　处：《外语学刊》2017年第3期60-66,共7页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"中国英语学习者句法加工的神经认知机制研究"(14AYY009);江苏省15创新计划项目"中国英语学习者词类加工的神经认知机制研究"(KYZZ15_0208)的阶段性成果;南京师范大学2015年校博士学位论文优秀选题资助计划的资助

摘　　要：后现代哲学思潮非常重视研究方法的多元化和对象考察的整体化。尽管研究者对汉语名动关系进行了大量卓有成效的研究,但对于汉语词类的特点至今仍未达成共识,存在"重语料考证、轻方法创新"和"重局部分析、轻整体思考"的不足。在尤其强调研究方法的当下,名动认知神经科学研究不仅为验证和修正汉语词类研究理论提供有效检验标准和启示,更为研究者发展和拓宽汉语词类研究路径提供新的进路和方法。The Post-modernistic view highlights the diversification of research methods and the integral investigation of research objects. Although studies on noun-verb relationship have yielded fruitful results, there are still many controversies to the characteristics of Chinese parts of speech and also some questions needing to be probed： ＂heavily depending on researchers＇ linguistic intuition, less creative in methodological innovation＂, ＂paying more attention to analyzing a certain single factor, ignoring the integral investigation of different factors＂. Considering the current growing emphasis on research method, the cognitive neuroscientific in- vestigations of nouns and verbs not only provide effective inspection standard and enlightenment for verifying the relevant researching results, but also supply researchers with a new direction or method to develop and broaden the ways of investigating Chinese parts of speech.

关 键 词：认知神经科学 汉语词类 方法多元化 理念整体化 

分 类 号：H042[语言文字—语言学]