检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛开翼[1]
出 处:《黑龙江高教研究》2017年第5期79-81,共3页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
摘 要:大学生社团是我国高校素质教育开展的第二课堂,社团评价的原则与标准的确立直接影响大学生综合素质的培养。大学生社团评价主要存在三个方面的问题:对不同学校的评价标准没有区别对待,评价指标缺乏针对性,评价主体较为单一。立足这三个方面不足,在确立社团评价的原则中,将社团发展目标、不同类型和等级学校的针对性、引入社会力量评价作为重中之重,在社团评价的标准中体现出社团素质拓展、社团影响力、学生参与程度等三个方面。The college students' community is the second classroom of quality education in colleges and universities in our country. The establishment of the principle and criteria of community evaluation affects the cultivation of college students' comprehensive quality directly. Three problems exist in the evaluation of college students' community such as no differences in the evaluation criteria of different schools, lack of the relative evaluation indexes, and the relatively single evaluation subject. Based on the three aspects a- bove, the community development goals, the pertinence of different schools with different types and levels, and the introduction of so- cial strength evaluation are as the top priorities in the principle of establishing community evaluation. The community evaluation stand- ards embody community quality development, community influence and student participation.
分 类 号:G40-012[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15