检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张慧凤[1] 张劲松[1,2] 帅澜[1] 路腾飞[1] 夏卫萍[1] 王周烨[1] 谭歆[1] ZHANG Hui-Feng ZHANG Jin-Song SHUAI Lan LU Teng-Fei XIA Wei-Ping WANG Zhou-Ye TAN Xin(Department of Medical Psychology, Department of Child and Adolescent Healthcare, Xinhua hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200092, China Ministry of Education and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children" s Environment Health, Shanghai 200092, China)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院临床心理科,儿童与青少年保健科,上海200092 [2]教育部与上海市环境与儿童健康重点实验室,上海200092
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2017年第5期371-375,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目"学前注意缺陷多动障碍的早期评价方法"(14411968600)
摘 要:目的:评价中文版反社会性行为特质筛查问卷(APSD)父母版的效度与信度。方法:选取符合精神障碍诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM-5)诊断标准的注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD,n=161)、对立违抗障碍(ODD,n=117)和品行障碍(CD,n=13)的儿童291例,以及年龄性别相匹配的正常儿童288例为研究对象(年龄6~13岁)。请其家长填写APSD父母版以评估儿童冷漠无情特质,填写Vanderbilt父母评定量表(VADPRS)及Conners父母症状问卷(PSQ)以评估儿童的行为问题,随机选取48名家长间隔1~3周再次填写APSD父母版问卷。对数据进行验证性因素分析、同时效度、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和内部一致性信度及重测信度分析,以评估APSD的效度和信度。结果:验证性因素分析显示,APSD 3因子模型结构拟合良好。同时效度,APSD与Vanderbilt父母评定量表及Conners父母症状问卷因子呈正相关(r=0.31~0.79,P<0.01)。ROC曲线显示,当APSD的T值为56时,诊断ADHD的灵敏度为0.82,特异度为0.81。APSD的内部一致性为0.65~0.83,重测信度为0.63~0.82。结论:中文版APSD父母版具有良好的效度和信度。Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device parent form (APSD) for young children in China. Methods: Parents of elementary school students (aged 6 - 13 years, n = 288) and parents of non-reference clinical patients who were diagnosed with attention-deft- cit/hyperactivity disorders (ADHD, n = 161 ), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD, n = 117) and conduct disorder (CD, n = 13) by psychiatrist based on DSM-V (aged 6 - 13 years, n = 291) completed the APSD, Vanderbilt ADHD Parent Rating Scale (VADPRS), Parents Symptom Questionnaire (PSQ). Forty-eight of them completed BRIEF-P retest after 2 weeks. Confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent validity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), internal consistency and test-retest reliability were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of APSD. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three factors model of APSD was reasona- ble. Subscales of APSD were moderately correlated ( r = 0. 31 - 0.79, P 〈 0. 01) with subscales of VanderbiltADHD Parent Rating Scale and Parents Symptom Questionnaire. ROC results showed that sensitivity and specificity were 0. 82 and 0. 81 wben the standard score was 56. Cronbach a coefficients were 0. 65 -0. 83 and retest reliabili- ties were 0. 63 - 0. 82. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of APSD are satisfactory in China.
关 键 词:冷漠无情 反社会性行为特质筛查问卷父母版 效度 信度
分 类 号:B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学] C913.5[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69