公共生活·人性书写·文学特质——沈从文、梁实秋关于文学介入公共生活思想之比较  

Public Life ·Healthy Humanity·Literary Characteristics——Comparison of Public Ideology of Liang Shiqiu's and Shen Congwen's Literary Thoughts

作　　者：于惠[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]盐城工学院人文学院,江苏盐城224000 [2]苏州大学文学院,江苏苏州215000

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第2期104-109,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2016SJD750013)"‘诗性正义’视域下的梁实秋文艺思想研究"

摘　　要：学界当前关于"诗性正义""审美正义"、文学道德价值等问题的探讨,或隐或显存在着关于文学介入公共生活的路径、方式及原则等值得我们进一步思考的地方。沈从文、梁实秋在其文学思想中穿越式地给出了自己的答案。他们都赞成文学参与公共生活,都采取了包含当下学者观点在内的文学介入公共生活的两种基本路径;他们都通过书写健康人性的方式使文学产生正能量,但对人性的界定及侧重点不同;他们都主张在坚持文学自主性的原则下,依靠文学特质实现文学的功用目的,但他们所关注的文学特质不同。At present the discussion on poetic justice,aesthetic justice,moral value of literature and so on is worth our deep thinking about the path,the way and the principle of re-incorporating literature into public life. Liang Shiqiu and Shen Congwen give us their answers in their literary thoughts. They all approve of re- incorporating literature into public life,but take different paths including the present scholars＇ viewpoints. They all make literature produce positive energy through describing healthy humanity,but are different from the definition and emphasis of humanity. They both advocate the principle of literary autonomy,and think that realizing literary function is to rely on the literary features,but are different from the emphasis on literary features.

关 键 词：沈从文 梁实秋 文学 公共生活 人性 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]