学业自我概念的建构:内/外参照模型研究述评  

The Construction of Academic Self-Concept:The Internal/External Frame of Reference Model

作　　者：李振兴[1] 邓欢[2] 郭成[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学心理学部心理健康与社会适应实验室西南大学心理健康教育研究中心,重庆400715 [2]中国人民大学心理学系,北京100872

出　　处：《心理科学》2017年第3期606-611,共6页Journal of Psychological Science

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWU1609325);重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(16SKB029)的资助

摘　　要：内/外参照模型在理论上同时考虑了社会比较和维度比较两种比较方式在建构个体学业自我概念过程中的作用。近年来,对内/外参照模型的研究进展主要体现在三个方面:对该模型进行跨文化一致性检验;提出了维度比较理论;与大鱼小池效应相整合。这些研究表明学业自我概念具有学科特异性,研究者要更加注重学业自我概念及其它学业变量的学科特异性研究,并加强内/外参照模型的调节因素研究,教师及家长要引导学生合理选择比较方式。Academic self-concept refers to an individual＇s perception, experience and evaluation of their academic development in an academic context. The Internal/External Frame of Reference Model （I/EM）, as one of the most important models for the construction of academic self-concept, refers to the process in which a person compares his or her ability in a subject with that in another subject to construct a subject -specific self-concept when evaluating his or her ability in the subject. It has theoretically investigated into the effects on the construction of academic self-concept produced by both the intra-individual and inter-individual frames of reference, proving that the construction of students＇ academic self-concept is influenced by external （or social） comparison as well as internal comparison of individual＇s different subject-specific abilities. Since the I/EM has been proposed, many researchers have used different methods to test its cross-culture generalizability widely, such as examining it in only one country or culture, examining the moderating role of country after a meta-analysis of the model was made, making a comparative study in different countries or cultures using the same instrument and method, all of these studies supported the cross-culture generalizability of the UEM. However, lots of studies suggested that the construction of academic self-concept of Chinese mainland adolescents had its specificity due to the distinct difference in academic self-concept between western and Chinese mainland adolescents. Therefore, to more critically examine the cross-culture generalizability, we should also focus on the analysis of its regional and ethnical difference when examining it by using national big samples. Moller and Marsh （2013） proposed the dimensional comparison theory （DCT） by means of summarizing the studies of the model, and defined dimensional comparison a process that a single individual compared his or her ability in a domain with his or her ability in another domain. T

关 键 词：内/外参照模型 学业自我概念 维度比较 大鱼小池效应 

分 类 号：B848[哲学宗教—心理学]