检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,北京100190 [2]中国人民大学心理学系,北京100872
出 处:《管理评论》2017年第5期75-86,共12页Management Review
摘 要:本研究以10家制造业企业中的216名员工为研究对象,采用层级回归分析,探讨了领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距对员工工作满意度和组织承诺的影响,并检验了领导信任的中介作用和上下级沟通频率的调节作用。研究结果表明:领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距对员工工作满意度和组织承诺存在显著的负向影响;领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距对领导信任存在显著的负向影响;领导信任对领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距影响工作满意度和组织承诺的过程具有显著的中介作用;上下级沟通频率在领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距与领导信任之间具有显著的调节作用。The objectives of this study are to examine the relationship between leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference, job satisfaction and organizational commitment, and to investigate the mediating effect of trust in leader and the moderate effect of leader- follower interaction frequency. To achieve this purpose, the data collected from 216 employees who work for manufacturing corporations is used for hierarchical regression analysis. The results show that: First, leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference has a sig- nificant negative effect on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Second, leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype differ- ence has a significant negative effect on trust in leader. Third, leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference has a significant indirect effect on job satisfaction and organizational commitment with mediation effect of trust in leader. Forth, frequency of leader-follower interaction has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference and trust in leader.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145