检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学中国教育财政科学研究所,北京100871
出 处:《北京大学教育评论》2017年第2期1-16,共16页Peking University Education Review
摘 要:本文在分析我国教师工资管理体制运转机理的基础上,重点研究了现行教师绩效工资体制所遇到的突出矛盾,包括工资标准难以根据市场调查的客观依据进行正常的调整和增长,中央政府被迫通过行政手段周期性清理规范地方性津补贴,以及教师的微观激励机制被扭曲等。本文认为,要克服现行体制的弊端,必须适度调整中央各行政部门之间的权力制衡机制,并以省级统筹为基础进行适度分权化的改革,进而构建适应市场经济环境的教师工资体制。On the basis of analyzing the operation mechanism of the teacher salary management system in China,this paper focuses on the outstanding contradictions encountered in the current teacher performance-based salary system,including applying the centralized and unified salary system without considering imbalanced,regional economic development levels,the fact that the current funding guarantee mechanism could not support the normal wage growth mechanism,as well as having a distorted teacher micro-incentive mechanism.This paper argues that to overcome the shortcomings of the current system,it is necessary to moderately adjust the checks and balances of power among central administrative departments and carry out certain reforms of decentralization based on the provincial co-ordination mechanism,so as to build a teacher salary system that meets the challenges brought by market economy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.66