严羽“妙悟”说与柏拉图“迷狂”说中的神性思维比较  

Divine thinking comparison between Yan Yu's "wonderful enlightenment" theory and Plato's "ecstasy" theory

作　　者：邓珊珊[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学文学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《新余学院学报》2017年第3期105-107,共3页Journal of Xinyu University

摘　　要：严羽的"妙悟"说和柏拉图的"迷狂"说分别论述了诗人在创作诗歌时个体灵魂所达到的一种超然的姿态,从文学创作的理论视角来看,它们都隶属于灵感的范畴,是文艺创作的动力与源泉。但是,由于东西方文化的差异,宗教浸染的熏陶不同,严羽的"妙悟"说更多的是吸收了中国古代禅宗美学的思想,而柏拉图的"迷狂"说则是源自于古希腊神灵的凭附。因此,"妙悟"说与"迷狂"说虽然都是阐述诗人在灵感应会之际的精神状态,都是从神性的思维方式出发,然而,它们的这种神性思维方式又存在着很大的差异性。Yah Yu＇s ＂wonderful enlightenment＂ theory and Plato＇s＂ecstasy＂ theory respectively demonstrated poets＇detached attitude of soul when they wrote poems. From the perspective of literature creation theory, they belong to inspiration category and are the driving force and source of art creation. But owing to the difference between eastern and western culture and religious influence, Yan Yu＇s ＂ wonderful enlightenment＂ theory absorbed ancient Chinese Zen aesthetic thought while Plato＇s ＂ecstasy＂ theory came from ancient Greek gods. Therefore although they demonstrated poetslspiritual state of inspiration and started from divine thinking way, their divine thinking way was different.

关 键 词：严羽 妙悟说 柏拉图 迷狂说 神性思维 

分 类 号：J04[艺术—艺术理论]