高校本科专业评估指标体系的信度与效度研究  

Reliability and Validity of Valuation Indicator System for the Undergraduate Programs

作　　者：王庆辉[1] 杨荣昌[1] 孙莱祥[2] 

机构地区：[1]上海商学院高等教育研究所,上海201400 [2]复旦大学,上海200433

出　　处：《黑龙江高教研究》2017年第7期59-62,共4页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年项目"中美研究型大学系主任领导效能及其影响因素研究"(编号:15YJC880087);上海市哲学社会科学一般项目暨教育科学规划重点项目"美国公立研究型大学教师评议会制度对上海高校的启示研究"(编号:A1208);上海商学院教师教学发展中心课题"基于中本贯通的教学质量保障研究"(编号:15JFSBS07)

摘　　要：文章采用上海市两所高校123个专业的专业评估实测数据,考察上海市高校本科专业达标评估指标体系的信度和效度。通过克朗巴赫(Cronbach’s)α系数、相关分析和因子分析(factor analysis)等方法检验指标体系的信度和效度。数据分析结果表明,本科专业达标评估指标体系的克朗巴赫(Cronbach’s)α系数为0.828;20项指标得分都与总分的相关系数在0.01的水平上显著相关;因子分析67.66%的总方差可以由7个因子解释。该本科专业达标评估指标体系具有较好的信度与效度,适合作为高校本科专业评估的测量工具。In this study,the professional evaluation of 123 specialties in two universities from Shanghai was used to examine the reliability and validity of the undergraduate evaluation indicator system of undergraduate education in Shanghai. The reliability and validity of the index system were tested by means of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient,correlation analysis and factor analysis. The result of data analysis shows that Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the second class indicators were 0. 828; The scores of the 20 indexes were significantly correlated with the coefficient of total score at the level of 0. 01. The factor analysis of the second class indicators showed that 7 factors were extracted,the accumulative variance reached 67. 661%. The evaluation indicator system has good reliability and validity,which can be used for evaluating the undergraduate programs.

关 键 词：本科专业 评估指标体系 信度分析 效度分析 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]