新高考改革的风险及其规避--基于风险社会理论的思考  

Risks and Risks Avoiding of the New College Entrance Examination Reform

作　　者：李宝庆 魏小梅[1] Li Baoqing Wei Xiaomei(Institute for Education Development of the Urban and Rural Areas as a Whole, Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715)

机构地区：[1]西南大学统筹城乡教育发展研究中心、教育学部,重庆400715

出　　处：《教育发展研究》2017年第12期22-29,共8页Research in Educational Development

基　　金：2016年度重庆市社会科学规划一般项目“新高考进程中的高中学业水平考试改革研究”(2016YBJY065);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助重大培育项目“新高考改革进程中学校整体变革研究”(SWU1709227);重庆市2016年度高等教育教学改革研究重点项目“‘双创’背景下高校创新实验班学生学习力的培育机制研究”(162011)的部分成果

摘　　要：新高考改革进程中隐含着素质教育与应试教育之间的"钟摆现象"、普通高中学校办学缺乏特色、高中学生自主发展异化等风险。风险社会理论为分析新高考改革面临的风险提供了分析框架。通过整合贝克、吉登斯、鲁曼、拉什等学者的风险社会理论,将新高考改革风险归因于新高考改革决策者与专家的结盟、高中学校自我生存的利益驱动、高中学生职业生涯规划指导不足等因素。为规避新高考改革的风险,我们可以采取如下策略:树立改革风险意识与呼唤风险决策伦理;探索高中学校特色办学与管理模式;建构高中职业生涯规划指导体系。In the course of the new college entrance examination reform, high school students face the risk of fairness, high schools face the quality risk of education and teaching, colleges and universities face the scientific risk of admission. The risk society theory provides us with a new analytical framework facing the new college entrance examination reform. Through the integration of different scholars, such as Ulrich Beck, Anthony Giddens, Scott Lash, the causes of risks are mainly attributed to the man-made risks from the alliance between policy makers and experts; the universality and particularity of risk distribution; the fracture between tool rationality and value ethics, scientific rationality and social ethics. In order to avoid risks of the new college entrance examination reform, we should construct the cultural criticism and the risk responsibility ethics through the main body of the policy reform, establish the reflection mechanism both in risk consciousness and risk culture, and integrate organically between tool rationality and value ethics,scientific rationality and social ethics.

关 键 词：风险社会理论 新高考改革 

分 类 号：G632.474[文化科学—教育学]