努斯鲍姆“诗性正义”观及其争议辨析  

“Poetic Justice”by Martha C. Nussbaum and Its Analysis of the Dispute

作　　者：刘锋杰[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学中国诗学研究中心,安徽芜湖340200 [2]苏州大学文学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《河北学刊》2017年第5期92-98,共7页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2013年度国家社会科学基金项目<文学政治学的历史形态与当代创新研究>(13BZW002)

摘　　要：美国学者努斯鲍姆提出"诗性正义"的命题,并论述了它的三个特征:"走向他人"的重要性、在人性上"保持丰富性"的必要性以及"诗性裁判"的可能性。她用"诗性正义"去纠正经济活动与司法活动中忽略人的情感的偏向,证明文学想象是有益于公共生活的。这一观点引发了争议,批评者认为文学的情感特性决定了它极有可能损害公共生活的公正性。笔者认为,在涉及人的生命活动时,情感的准确性往往比理性的准确性更高一级,不是情感服从理性推进了生命的发展与丰富,而是理性服从情感推进了生命的发展与丰富。文学恰恰是凭借自身对于人的生命与情感的重视而成为人类正义事业的一部分的,离开这个基点,文学便失去了作用于正义事业的有效途径与方法。＂Poetic Justice＂ by Baum Yunus has three characteristics ： ＂going towards the others＂, ＂keep- ing abundant＂ and ＂poetic judgment＂. She used ＂Poetic Justice＂ to correct the tendency of ignoring peo- ple＇ s emotion in the economic and judicial activities in order that literary imagination should be beneficial to the public life. This brings about disputes that literary emotion may be harmful to the justice of public life. This paper thinks that the correctness of feeling is higher than that of reason in human activities. Lit- erature becomes one part of human justice because it values human life and emotion. Without this, litera- ture will lose its effective approach and method when it works as one part of justice.

关 键 词：努斯鲍姆 诗性正义 审美 情感 理性 

分 类 号：I0-05[文学—文学理论]