检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江胜华[1,2,3] 侯建国[2] 何英明[2] 李伟清[1] 汪时机[1] 鲍安红[1] 刘源[1] JIANG Shenghua HOU Jianguo HE Yingming LI Weiqing WANG Shiji BAO Anhong LIU Yuan(College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, P. R. China School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798)
机构地区:[1]西南大学工程技术学院,重庆400715 [2]武汉大学土木建筑工程学院,武汉430072 [3]南洋理工大学土木与环境工程学院,新加坡639798
出 处:《高等建筑教育》2017年第4期48-55,共8页Journal of Architectural Education in Institutions of Higher Learning
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51208078);重庆市前沿与应用基础研究计划(cstc2015jcyjA30008);西南大学科研基金资助项目(2017WJ001)
摘 要:针对中国和新加坡两国土木工程专业本科人才培养模式,以武汉大学和南洋理工大学为例,在土木工程专业的培养目标、方向设置、课程设置、教学模式、实践实习、毕业设计等6个方面作全面深入的比较。结果表明,武汉大学侧重某一方向的工程技能培养,南洋理工大学更强调科研、工程技能、职业能力、团队合作、职业伦理等综合素质培养。南洋理工大学土木工程专业核心课程数量多于武汉大学,涉及范围也大于武汉大学。武汉大学大部分课程的学时数量多于南洋理工大学,课程学习主要为教师讲授、学生听课的传统教学模式;南洋理工大学主要为学生自主学习的模式,且南洋理工大学培养了学生的团体合作、思辨能力和工程交流能力。对于土木工程的实践实习,南洋理工大学侧重培养学生的科学研究能力,武汉大学土木工程专业的本科阶段,尚缺乏对科学研究能力的培养。对于毕业设计,南洋理工大学在内容的广度和工作量上,均大于武汉大学土木工程的要求。根据6个方面的比较,给出武汉大学或国内其他高校土木工程专业人才培养模式改进建议,供高校土木工程专业参考。The training mode of civil engineering in China and Singapore are compared with the example of Wuhan University and Nanyang Technological University. The training mode comparison includes 6 aspects, i.e. training goal, field, and course system, teaching method, practice and diploma design. The results show that the engineering skills about one single field are paid more attention by Wuhan University, while general quality including scientific research, comprehensive engineering technique, career power up, team spirit and career ethics, are emphasized by Nanyang Technological University. There is a much wider range of specialized course in Nanyang Technological University than in Wuhan University. The academic hours of civil engineering in Wuhan University is more than that in Nanyang Technological University. The study mode is mainly the teachers' teaching and students' listening in Wuhan University, while in Nanyang Technological University; the students study more independently so that the team spirit, argumentative skill and engineering communication skill are trained. As for practice, the scientific research ability is stressed by Nanyang Technological University, which is lack in Wuhan University. The amount of work and scope of diploma design in Nanyang Technological University is much larger than that in Wuhan University. According to the comparison of 6 aspects, some suggestions have been given for civil engineering training mode of Wuhan University and other universities, which can be used as reference for revision of civil engineering training mode in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112