检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱芳芳[1]
出 处:《经济与管理评论》2017年第4期153-160,F0003,共9页Review of Economy and Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"社会资本视角下上市公司终极股东控制与剥夺问题研究"(项目编号:71072072);国家自然科学基金项目"真实控制权;社会资本与上市公司终极股东剥夺行为研究"(项目编号:71372200)的阶段性成果
摘 要:高管团队内薪酬差距的激励效应要考虑高团队本身的变化所产生的影响。以高管继任来源为切入点,对高管团队整合过程中的利益一致/冲突进行衡量,并观察其对高管薪酬差距及其激励效应所起到的作用。结果表明,高管团队存在利益冲突时,高管薪酬差距比高管团队利益一致时要小;高管团队利益一致时,高管薪酬差距与业绩显著正相关,支持锦标赛理论;高管团队利益冲突(与高管团队利益一致时相比)削弱了扩大薪酬差距以提升企业绩效的作用。本研究为完善上市公司高管团队建设提供了有益的理论支持。The incentive effect of the executive payment gap should concern the effect arising from team change. Taking the source of executive succession as a starting point, we measure conflict and harmony during the integration of top management team, and investigate whose impact on executive payment gap and incentive effects. The results show that the executive payment gap in conflicted teams is smaller than that in harmonious ones. The executive payment gap has a positive corelation with corporate performance while harmony exists in the top executive team, which supports tournament theory. Conflict in top management team alleviates the impact of executive payment gap on corporate performance. This paper provides theoretical support for perfecting corporate executive team construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62