辩护意见未予采纳的判决书说理问题研究  

Research on the judgment reasoning of unaccepted defense opinions

作　　者：汪家宝[1] 

机构地区：[1]周口师范学院政法学院,河南周口466001

出　　处：《周口师范学院学报》2017年第4期101-107,共7页Journal of Zhoukou Normal University

基　　金：最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题"审判中心主义下的诉辩审关系研究"(GJ2015D01);河南省社会科学规划项目"新刑事诉讼法实施背景下刑事和解制度研究"(2013BFX007)

摘　　要：判决书对未予采纳的辩护意见说理具有敦促律师勤勉辩护、倒逼控方提高起诉质量、推动法官依法司法、提升司法公信力、推动刑事诉讼程序改革等多元价值。然而,司法实践中,辩护意见不被采纳的判决书在证据说理、案情说理、定性说理、量刑说理和程序说理都存在问题,原因在于有些法官没有相应的说理能力、有些律师的辩护意见不具体、法律没有为这种说理建构相应的刑事庭审程序。因此,有必要从提升法官素质、强化辩护意见、加强程序保障等方面寻求应对之策。The argument of unaccepted defense opinions in the judgment has the values of urging lawyers to defense diligently, forcing the prosecuting party to improve the quality of prosecution, facilitating the judges＇ justice comply with the law, enhancing the public credibility of the judiciary and promoting the reform of criminal procedure. But there are still some problems in evidence argument, case details argument, qualitative argument, sentencing argument and procedure argument in judicial practice,of which the fundamental reasons are that the judges not be trained according to the the required ability of judgment reasoning,the substantial spaces not be provided to the lawyers and the trial procedure not be constructed around the judge reasons. Therefore, it is necessary to put forward solutions to rising the judges quality, strengthening the defense opinions, providing procedure guarantee and other aspects on the basis of analyzing the reasons for these problems.

关 键 词：辩护意见 判决书 说理能力 

分 类 号：D925.11[政治法律—诉讼法学]