检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东女子学院教育学院,山东济南250000 [2]闽南师范大学教育科学学院,福建漳州363000
出 处:《集美大学学报(教育科学版)》2017年第4期37-42,共6页Journal of Jimei University:Education Science Edition
摘 要:为了考察同伴团体对同伴关系与学习自控力关系的影响,选取650名高年级小学生作为研究对象,采用小学生学习自控力量表、班级戏剧问卷、同伴提名测验和社交认知地图作为研究工具,运用多层线性分析(HLM)进行多水平分析。研究表明:小学四、五、六年级同伴团体在亲社会行为、学业成绩、攻击行为上具有很强的同质性;个体水平上,同伴接纳能够显著正向预测学习自控力,同伴拒绝能够显著负向预测学习自控力;团体特征上,学业成就、亲社会行为对同伴接纳与学习自控力关系的斜率存在正效应,攻击性行为对同伴接纳与学习自控力关系的斜率存在负效应,攻击性行为对同伴拒绝与学习自控力的关系存在正效应。结论:同伴团体调节着同伴关系与学习自控力的关系。The research was to study the influence of peer groups on the relationship between peer relationship and self-control in pupils' learning. In the research,the Self-Control Scale in Learning of Younger Pupils,Class Play Scale,Peer Nomination Method and SCM were used as research tools,HLM used as analysis method to test650 high-grade pupils. The results showed: peer groups had a high homogeneity in academic performance,prosocial behavior and aggressive behavior; at the individual level,peer acceptance could significantly positively predict self-control in learning,while peer rejection could significantly negatively predict self-control in learning; in terms of group characteristics,the influence of academic performance and prosocial behavior on the relationship between peer relationship and self-control in learning was positive,and aggressive behavior was negative; the influence of aggressive behavior on the relationship between peer rejection and self-control in learning was negative.Conclusion: peer group could adjust the relationship between peer relationship and self-control in pupils' learning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.24.18