“共区”原则的历史作用、演变趋势与我国的应对策略  

Historical Role and Evolution Trend of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility and China's Corresponding Strategy

作　　者：陈洪波[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院城市发展与环境研究所,北京100028

出　　处：《生态经济》2017年第10期163-167,共5页Ecological Economy

基　　金："十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目"气候变化国际谈判与国内减排关键支撑技术研究与应用"(2012BAC20B11)

摘　　要："共区"原则曾发挥了历史性的重要作用,后京都气候谈判之后,"共区"原则逐步演变,"责任"逐渐趋同,《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《京都议定书》原有意义上的"共区"原则退化为道义上和政治上的原则,法律约束力几近丧失。我国应理性取舍"共区"原则,近期逐步淡化、弱化"共区"原则,并在适当时机予以放弃。进而重新界定国际气候道义,确立具有中国特色的、能被国际社会广泛认同和接受的国际气候治理的价值观和理论体系。在此基础上,提出后巴黎国际气候制度构建的"中国方案"。＂The principle of common but differentiated responsibility＂ once played a very important and historical role, but from the climate negotiation of the post-Kyoto regime, the principle was gradually evolving, the ＂responsibility＂ was becoming ＂common＂, and the original intention of the principle in the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol degenerated to a moral and political principle, meanwhile, its＇ legally binding force is nearly completely wiped out. China should rationally treat the principle, weakening it in the coming few years and abandoning it in a long term, and then re-define the international climate morality, and set up the values and a theory system of international climate governance with Chinese characteristics and it is widely accepted by the international community. On this basis, China should propose the ＂Chinese programme＂ about the post-Paris climate regime,

关 键 词：气候变化 “共区”原则 国际气候制度 中国策略 

分 类 号：X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学] F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]